Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 981 - 1000
of 13,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2009, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm
The state argued that the BTA properly weighed all of the evidence, but Justice Fischer concluded that the price of the bobblehead was overwhelmingly proven to be included in the ticket price, which the BTA did not find. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 9:31 am
In particular, Justice Gorsuch relied indirectly on Justice Brennan's plurality decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
At oral argument yesterday in Hawaii v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
State courts will have their own unique rules. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
The court relied on Price v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 1:40 pm
People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:10 am
The Justices certainly did not speak with one voice when they heard arguments Wednesday in Mississippi v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm
In its June 21, 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:59 pm
Question two: The effect of Castle v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:55 am
Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:00 pm
One thing is for certain about the decision in US v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 10:14 am
Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:00 pm
In Price v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:02 pm
AU Optronics Corp., Docket No. 12-1036, a price-fixing case between the State of Mississippi and a number of electronics companies. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:02 pm
AU Optronics Corp., Docket No. 12-1036, a price-fixing case between the State of Mississippi and a number of electronics companies. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 9:33 pm
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:25 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
, Taxes and Priorities, R.I.P., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
The best answer, then, would be for the Supreme Court to revisit its conclusion in the 1992 case Quill Corporation v North Dakota, which required a physical presence in order for states to mandate collection of their sales taxes by companies that make sales to their residents. [read post]
