Search for: "State v. Robins" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am by Wessen Jazrawi
In the courts Hurley & Moore, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation & Skills [2012] EWHC 201 (Admin) (17 February 2012). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am by admin
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:52 am by 1 Crown Office Row
R (T) v (1) Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, (2) Secretary of State for the Home Department (Secretary of State for Justice an interested party) [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) – read judgment. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm by Sam Murrant
AT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 42 (07 February 2012). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
The letter further stated that "[t]he Department believes that the voluntary placement of the children with Robin S[.] was in the best interests of the children. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:55 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Concepcion - Hartford, CT lawyer Wystan Ackerman of Robinson & Cole on the firm's Insurance Class Actions Insider WWJD--United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:18 am by Walter Olson
” [Ken, Popehat] “Why Mitt Romney likes firing people” [Suzanne Lucas] Free speech and union dues: Tim Sandefur on the oral argument in Knox v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:21 am
 Take, for example, Hollister Inc and another v Medik Ostomy Supplies Ltd [2011] EWPCC 40, a case decided last month, while the pine leaves glistened freshly on a forest of Christmas trees and flocks of red-breasted robins made their annual appearance on the nation's greeting cards. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The state of libel litigation in England and Wales in 2011 can be summarised like this: no jury trials, not much media involvement and similar numbers of cases to 2010. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
YSL's attorneys therefore maintained that Louboutin is not entitled to a trademark for the red soles, citing the United States Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Qualitex v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:42 pm
In the Second Circuit the test for aesthetic functionality was laid down in Wallace International Silversmith v Godinger Silver Art (1990). [read post]