Search for: "State v. South"
Results 981 - 1000
of 11,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2011, 4:28 pm
In Lobegeiger v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:38 am
The plaintiff in the case of English v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:17 pm
The Supreme Court handed down its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 5:23 am
Thadlar and Naidoo have argued in support of the CIPC decision stating that it aligns with South Africa's adherence to a purposive approach to statutory interpretation where the purpose of a given statute is looked to for its interpretation. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:59 am
No doubt, BPI's counsel, Winston & Strawn, Chicago's oldest law firm took every word of that 1995 9th Circuit opinion into account when it was writing BPI's lengthy complaint filed against ABC News in South Dakota state court Thursday. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:56 am
March 3, 2017) (putative class action removed from South Carolina state court brought by consumers alleging Blue Cross and Blue Shield denied requests to pay for healthcare that was approved and/or requested by physicians). [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Box 8206 Columbia, SC 29202-8206 Phone: (803) 898-2500 E-mail: info@dhhs.state.sc.us Web: http://www.dhhs.state.sc.us/InsideDHHS/Bureaus/BureauofSeniorServices/default.htm AARP South Carolina SouthTrust Tower 1201 Main Street, Suite 1280 Columbia, SC 29201 Phone: (803) 251-7860 Fax: (803) 251-4374 E-mail: scaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.org/states/sc ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Southeast Disability and Business Technical Assistance… [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 3:00 am
You may recall that in Interscope v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:21 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:57 pm
The February 10, 2021, Court of Appeals opinion in Daily v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:58 am
Here is the opinion in State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 6:01 am
In Arista v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:45 am
Marshak v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
Widdicombe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:16 am
Republic Servs. of South Carolina, LLC, No. 2:16-cv-02804 (D.S.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:41 am
The appellant councils in Merseyside and South Yorkshire sought to challenge the Secretary of State’s decisions on the allocation of the funds, which were based on allocations for 2013, and took no account of the transitional funding received in the earlier period. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:43 am
The ACLU filed the lawsuit along with the ACLU of South Dakota and Dana Hanna of the Hanna Law Office in Rapid City. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm
The statement stated in relevant part as follows: The Economic Freedom Fighters objects to the patently nepotistic, and corrupt process of selecting the South African revenue services’ commissioner. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:26 am
Earlier coverage of Oklahoma's drug shortage and the Beaty v. [read post]
