Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2011, 12:54 pm
State Bar of Arizona; Goldfarb v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
What meaning this old ruling, Perez v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:39 pm
Town of Greece v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:01 am
An attempt to lower the board members’ pay was precluded with respect to several members because of a state constitution provision prohibiting the reduction of a sitting member’s pay. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
” Similarly, in DNC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm
Circuit Judge Paul V. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:52 am
The reason for this is because the Sipuel decision is premised on the separate but equal doctrine established in Plessy v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:48 am
Virginia Board of Elections (1966), which struck down a $1.50 poll tax on the ground that it violated equal protection. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
But he argued that, if a state expressly gave political bosses the power to select judicial nominees, without any input from the party members, that scheme would violate the Constitution. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
” Despite the VRA’s advancement of racial equality in America, apparently the D.C. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:19 pm
Cuomo (2020) and Tandon v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
United States, 264 U.S. 146 (1924). [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
Board of Education to American law and life. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
For the convenience of readers, I reiterate from previous postings that Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
The following contribution to our Fisher symposium comes from Roger Clegg, president and general counsel of the Center for Equal Opportunity. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:24 am
The Court of Appeals also noted that the United States Supreme Court stated a “basic teaching of representative government … that elected officials represent all of those who elect them, and not merely those who are their neighbors," citing Dusch (387 US 112, Dallas County, Alabama v Reese (421 US 477) and Fortson v Dorsey, 379 US 433. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 3:12 pm
The Texas Supreme Court identified several factors courts should consider in Murff v. [read post]
