Search for: "State v. Weight" Results 981 - 1000 of 7,982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:53 pm by Robert C. Weill
  The supreme court adopted the harmless standard used in criminal cases stated in State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm by David Oscar Markus
  Professor Berman summarized the opinions here:In Anthony v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
  By contrast, the Tax Court’s purely legal conclusions would be afforded great weight, but would not bind the Court and would be considered de novo. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
  The AG’s hypothetical complaint would have been based on the state DTPA, so a four part test from Singh v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  Press a couple keys, there’s all the standard stuff on manifest weight, or sentencing under State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 1:43 pm by Lydia Estep
By: Alex Butterman On April 5, 2021, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Google, LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 5:03 am by Lyle Denniston
  The state noted it is willing to have its case, if granted, put on the same briefing schedule as King v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
The Supreme Court has recently delivered an important judgment in the case of National Legal Services Authority v Union of India (NALSA). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:26 am by Randy Barnett
[no commandeering of state legislatures] & Printz v U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 6:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
So the officers appealed, but the Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction to resolve the appeal on technical grounds.The case is Bryant v. [read post]