Search for: "Stevens v. Marks"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
Two years later, in McDonald v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
Two years later, in McDonald v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
Twp. of Northville, 629 F.3d 533, 548 (6th Cir. 2010) (internal alteration and quotation marks omitted); see also KH Outdoor, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 5:08 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Steven Mayberry v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 8:02 am
Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 1:50 pm
Before United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
They relied on the following statement by the Supreme Court in the 1928 case of Frost v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
However, for only “average” well-known marks”, the threshold of necessary closeness depends on how well-known the trademark is, on the similarity of the marks, and on the type of injury. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am
Cupo, Mark D. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Eglet , Mainor Eglet, Las Vegas Mark E. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 6:20 am
The Court of Session ruled in February 2014 that the pub owner was in breach of Sky’s copyright by showing a Celtic v Ross County game without a commercial agreement. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Janus v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm
Professor Rick Hasen has some thoughts on RNC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 4:01 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on Gordon v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:30 am
Bebchuk (Harvard Law School), on Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Tags: delaware, Delaware General Corporation Law, Delaware law, DGCL, moelis, stockholder agreements Chancery Subjects Reincorporation to Entire Fairness, Delaware Supreme Court Says Not So Fast Posted by Mark Thierfelder, Eric Siegel, and Richard Horvath, Dechert LLP, on Wednesday, May 22, 2024 Tags: delaware, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, Nevada, Palkon v Maffei, TripAdvisor The SEC as an Entrepreneurial… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post (subscription required), Steven Mazie worries that “[i]f the tenor of the oral argument [in Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 11:20 am
” This decision in Stevens v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 8:01 am
(As Justice Scalia said in his dissent in BMW v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 11:20 am
” This decision in Stevens v. [read post]
