Search for: "Still v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 44,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
January 5, 2023 | By: Ryan Kennedy On November 7, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Virginia decided the case of Harrell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:04 pm
Quinn and Burwell v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 9:49 am
With hundreds of individual actions still pending in Florida state and federal courts, this decision is likely only the beginning in a journey that may ultimately reach the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 11:28 am
The post Argument analysis: Still no clarity on partisan gerrymandering appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:26 pm
” However, the court looked to the Maryland Court of Appeals decision in Coleman v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
The name of the case is Xia v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm
See Truly Nolen of Amer. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 5:07 am
See id.; State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Still, sometimes, as in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:35 pm
In the pending investor-state-dispute-settlement case under an older but parallel North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) investment clause, an American pharmaceutical company, in Eli Lilly v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:52 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:38 pm
Nevertheless, the ruling still essential embraces the fundamentals of Coker. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:19 pm
In Avery v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:08 am
United States wasn’t really in doubt. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:18 pm
But it's still the state's fault -- and a continuing one, at that -- that many defendants in criminal cases in Riverside don't get a speedy trial. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm
In its 2011 decision in Harrington v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:00 pm
”Referring to Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
He admitted "voting discrimination still exists; no one doubts that." [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:27 am
This case highlights the importance of landlords and tenants alike being aware of their rights and obligations when it comes to deposits and the legal consequences of a tenant remaining in occupation of premises beyond the period stated in the agreement. [read post]
