Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 16,384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2009, 7:41 pm
In the recent California case of Nazir v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm
The dispute before the court in Moore v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 7:33 am
In this instance, the courts approved the request of the parties to apply the law of Massachusetts to their case, thanks to the strong connection both the case and the parties had to the state in question. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:38 am
In Dennis v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
(quoting Tellabs v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:41 pm
” Quick on the heels of the imprimatur of the solidly conservative Economist stating that the 2008 election is Hillary’s to lose, the film gives life to our culture’s fascination with the fantasy of a strong (feminist?) [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
If you work much on antitrust lawsuits, you learn the names of cases that inspire strong feelings on both sides of the "v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:11 am
Ten percent of African Americans, as compared to 40 percent of whites, think the decision was fair. 79 percent of Strong Republicans but only seven percent of Strong Democrats considered the decision fair, which is about the same breakdown one sees on the question as between those who strongly approve or strongly disapprove of the Bush presidency. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm
Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am
Today, Indian Country is strong. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
The UK Supreme Court stated that had the patent specification not referred to anti-folates generally, but only pemetrexed disodium, then this would have been a strong indication that the patentee was intending to limit himself to pemetrexed disodium. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:08 pm
Today, in SEC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
But to the stated end? [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:58 am
Judge Padova wrote strong opinions rejecting the motions. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
P.F.V. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
Cir. 1983), the plaintiffs referenced the “strong presumption” that a regulated entity will comply with the law. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:19 pm
Moreover, as a practical matter, at the end of the day, I think it very likely that state court judges don't have much to worry about from this one, since there's footnote 11 as well as -- in my mind -- a strong likelihood that, if nothing else, the Legislature will step in to clean this problem up and make sure that judges get their benefits.Still. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:53 am
Montana’s success in passing mostly reasonable privacy laws, many of which offer strong protections lacking in other, much larger states’ laws, shows that concerns about privacy easily cut across political lines. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 12:42 pm
Schnell (Religious Freedom) United States of America v. [read post]
