Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
So held New York County Supreme Court Special Referee Louis Crespo in his April 3, 2014 decision in Steineger v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Oregon Supreme Court: Wrong, that double-dipping is totally fine. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:42 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Ultimately, the Michigan Supreme Court held that admission of Covington’s statements violated the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:42 am by Stephen Bilkis
It has been observed that there is hardly a law on the books that does not affect some people differently from others. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 10:43 am
The 7-member California Supreme Court, which voted 4-3 last May that same-sex couples had a right to marry under the California Constitution, heard arguments on March 5 about whether a slim majority of the voters on November 4 had validly amended the state's Constitution to change that result by approving Proposition 8. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 7:53 am by David M. McLain
 The Court looked at the dictionary definition of “residence” (a place where people live) and the fact that the property was zoned for residential use. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 7:53 am by David M. McLain
 The Court looked at the dictionary definition of “residence” (a place where people live) and the fact that the property was zoned for residential use. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
Watts did not observe any of the driver's facial features, but he did observe that the driver, the sole occupant of the vehicle, was a black male wearing a `bright red[-]like sweater shirt. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
At his retirement in 1952, Chief Justice John Latham (himself a deeply conservative figure and former Opposition Leader) declared (in light of the trouble and controversy that the section had caused lawyers and judges alike) that '[w]hen I die, s. 92 will be found written on my heart': (1952) 85 CLR ix. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 10:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
I've observed that it's not actually true. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:28 am by INFORRM
I've spent my working life on this (see my book, 'Online Courts and the Future of Justice') & am confident judges can deliver just decisions working online. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
QUESTIONS PRESENTEDii LIST OF PARTIESPursuant to Supreme Court Rule 24.1(b), the following list identifies all of the parties before theKentucky Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 4:08 am
There are two big news stories due this Wednesday, and the Guardian/Observer thinks it has the answers on both.The first, and most important, story is the Government's spending review, and its effect on legal aid. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 5:42 pm
(Joe Scott Miller's running web page tally of post-eBay cases shows this. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 10:14 am by Center for Internet and Society
Last month, the Supreme Court of California may have decided the future of the public's access to "smart city" data without knowing it. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 12:40 pm by Paul Horwitz
  Adler, who later wrote to agree with Tushnet's observation, wrote some (fair) critical remarks that ended in a kind of cri de coeur: "[T]he game hasn’t just begun. [read post]