Search for: "Sweet v. Sweet"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then summarized the case law regarding the required proof:In addition, according to case-law, although it must be proved that a mark has acquired distinctive character through use throughout the European Union, the same types of evidence do not have to be provided in respect of each Member State (...).Furthermore, the Court has repeatedly held that there was insufficient proof of distinctive character acquired through use of a mark throughout the European Union where evidence was missing… [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
If you have been busy enjoying the first days of sweet summer, no worries at all, the 153rd edition of Never Too Late is here to bring you your weekly dose of IP news! [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
Anyway, the IPKat, Merpel and all the crew are at your disposal and look forward to sharing lots of news, views and fun with you in the four months that take us to the end of the year.After renaming the Patents County Court theIntellectual Property Enterprise Court, we nowhave a new name for the Court of AppealThis Kat is furious that the Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in Lumos Skincare Limited v Sweet Squared Limited and others -- a decision that drew some… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 8:10 am
Mahomes -180 v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:02 pm
It starts off aromatic, sweet, juicy. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:19 am
Salazar v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
If you have been busy enjoying the first days of sweet summer, no worries at all, the 153rd edition of Never Too Late is here to bring you your weekly dose of IP news! [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:13 am
Garcia v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:25 am
Yesterday, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) issued its decision in Case C-432/18, Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH [here]. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:33 am
On the other hand, the reputation of a trade mark will no longer be considered in concluding that a mark is “too famous” to be confused, as was the case in Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 174.Relevance of surrounding circumstances in considering deceptive similarity Following the High Court’s rejection of the reputation principle, it went on to consider whether PROTOX or “instant BOTOX alternative” were deceptively similar… [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
They’re tasty, but just not as sweet as that candy bar. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:51 am
The main updates in this latest edition include:Coverage of BrexitAmendments to the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 made by the Digital Economy Act 2017 and the Copyright and Related Rights (Marrakesh Treaty etc) (Amendment) Regulations 2018Analysis of CJEU case law concerning copyright and related rights, and in particular the right of communication to the publicAnalysis of recent UK case law, such as Heythrop Zoological Gardens Ltd v Captive Animals Protection Society and Warner… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:41 am
”A contemporary three-bedroomed apartment in Palgrave, one of the newest residential blocks at the V&A Waterfront. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:06 pm
Rice-Sherman v. [read post]
State v. Cain and State v. Simms – NJ Supreme Court Reaffirms the Role of the Jury as Trier of Facts
3 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
Following his arrest, the detectives approached the silver car and observed a bundle of heroin on the back passenger seat, which was later found to have the logo “Sweet Dreams”. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Johnson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:32 am
In the decision of Carroll v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 3:22 am
V. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
In Merisant Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
R & L Contracting Ltd. v. [read post]
