Search for: "T-Mobile US, Inc."
Results 981 - 1000
of 2,088
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 14-144 (involving a First Amendment challenge to license plate restrictions), and Bullard v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
(d) Rather too complicated for us ordinary mortals to understand (e) You can stop living like a king. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
§ 1 et seq., as held by this Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
In 2011, the US Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:17 am
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, in which it concluded that the “proper burden of proof imposed upon a defendant to establish the amount in controversy is the preponderance of the evidence standard. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Why haven’t we seen similar changes in Canada? [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Google Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 8:36 am
Case citation: Robert Half International, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
The possibility of litigation reform through bylaw revision received a substantial boost in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 3:00 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 2009), where the Eleventh Circuit overruled the district court’s class certification analysis and held that a proposed class was not amenable to Rule 23 certification. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:09 am
As reported in the Privacy & Information Security Law blog, the Federal Trade Commission announced a settlement of at least $90 million with mobile phone carrier T-Mobile USA, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
The main question at issue is whether Google infringed Oracle’s patents and copyrights by copying Oracle-owned Java APIs in Android (Google’s mobile operating system) without authorization, but many spicy issues are at stake: a smartphone IP dispute between two tech giants, a lot of money, a potential fair use exception, and copyright law in the computer context. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
The second of the Court’s trademark cases this week was Hana Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 1:08 am
The BSCs were connected to a network sub-system, which hosted two units, the MSC (Mobile Switching Centre) and the SGSN (Serving GPRS Support Mode), respectively used to route calls and Internet traffic. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 10:13 am
In citing the Supreme Court’s 2011 AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 10:13 am
In citing the Supreme Court’s 2011 AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 4:04 am
If it wasn’t Apple, someone else would have patented technology that would allow the government to accomplish the goal of shutting us down. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Emilie Elias, however, has recently concluded that this doesn’t apply when the foreign law is the law of Iran — and the rationale potentially applies to other countries that use Islamic law, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and others. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
” Senator Steve O’Ban, however, took the more dangerous path, asserting that the voters in his district don’t care. [read post]
