Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm
A group of California vineyard operators will be represented in the case of Horne v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:50 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
Madigan v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:45 am
The ACLU has challenged these policies in Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
No offense to you mere associates.) [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
Justice Scalia’s concurring opinion in California v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 6:36 pm
See Bartnicki v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:57 am
Doe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:37 pm
It may not even be a civil offense. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:39 am
California, the Court reflected upon the resurrection of an offense after the statute of limitations had passed. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 2:47 pm
Take rape, for example. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
KingIssue: (1) Whether the hot pursuit exception to the warrant requirement is contingent on a subjective determination of pursuit; and (2) what constitutes a serious offense for purposes of dispensing with the warrant requirement; and what test or tests is proper to determine when warrantless entry is permissible. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:55 am
Evans v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
In California, the sentence was discretionary, leaving the state courts to figure out exactly what Miller meant. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:39 am
” Ward v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
See also Coffin v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
This means that both Alaska and California would have the same one vote, and 26 votes would be necessary to elect a president. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:39 am
Justice Jackson wrote in his dissent in Beauharnais v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:40 pm
) - Sutter County District Attorney and California District Attorneys Association (CDAA) President Carl V. [read post]
