Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 2,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2008, 3:50 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 1:23 pm
This issue is often raised in college towns (see this table), and our Supreme Court has issued a ruling on it (Dvorak v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:22 pm
In that case, Sullivan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am
However, the record does not demonstrate that the court was so vexed that it could not be impartial (22 NYCRR 100.3[E][1]; see Liteky v United States, 510 US 540, 555-556 [1994]; Hass & Gottlieb v Sook Hi Lee, 55 AD3d 433, 434 [1st Dept 2008]; People v A.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 11:14 am
., S.P.A. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
It must: state that a possession order is being sought; give reasons; specify the date after which proceedings may be begun; that date must not be earlier than the date on which an NTQ would be effective; inform the tenant that they can request a review and how long they have to make that request; and inform the tenant that if they need help or advice they can go a CAB, solicitor, etc. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
It must: state that a possession order is being sought; give reasons; specify the date after which proceedings may be begun; that date must not be earlier than the date on which an NTQ would be effective; inform the tenant that they can request a review and how long they have to make that request; and inform the tenant that if they need help or advice they can go a CAB, solicitor, etc. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
[Sir Alan Ward]This was a case that was potentially important for establishing whether Article 8 defences could be run by private tenants, or by licencees and occupiers of private land. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
”Section 75 defines who “qualifying tenants” are. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 11:48 am
Opara v Olasemo (2020) UKUT 96 (LC) and Mortimer v Calcagno (2020) UKUT 122 (LC) had found that it was not necessary to have first hand evidence from all the occupants of an HMO in order to be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the main residence of all (or a sufficient number) of tenants, and that the Tribunal can draw inferences from findings of fact, this did not help the appellants in this case. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:08 am
In particular a reference is made to the case of Artworld v Safaryan (which we dealt with here). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Then, on 5 May 2022, the landlord’s solicitors wrote to Mr B enclosing a section 21 notice and stating ‘we are advised your deposit was returned to you’. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:10 am
Calogero KINGS COUNTYLandlord/Tenant Law Landlord's Failure to Serve Tenant With 20-Day Notice Under 28 RCNY §21-23 Fatal to Proceeding Saunders Homes HDFC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am
San Francisco Tomorrow, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
April 10, 2019) (state court complaint removed to federal court alleging landlords violated the North Carolina Residential Rental Agreement Act, Debt Collection Act, and related state law by assessing and attempting to collect certain fees and charges from tenants) Neely v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:09 pm
In Matter of Vinrus v. the Village of Pelham Manor Building Inspector, the building inspector had issued a notice that the property owner was required to obtain a certificate of occupancy for a new tenant. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:09 pm
In Matter of Vinrus v. the Village of Pelham Manor Building Inspector, the building inspector had issued a notice that the property owner was required to obtain a certificate of occupancy for a new tenant. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 5:50 am
Corp. v Jagger, 2008 NY Slip Op 07987. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
Ireland, TV Vest v. [read post]
