Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Woods" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2009, 7:47 am
More on the 2002 Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Norwood, MA; Margaret Wood, President) Bay State Cartage Administration, Inc. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:38 am by lsammis
Moreover, we alleged that her arrest was without a lawful warrant, probable cause or other lawful authority in violation of the rights guaranteed by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Finally, we sought to suppress any statements obtained from our client, as well as her identity, were obtained in violation of her rights pursuant to the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article I, sections 9, 16, and… [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:23 am
" Earthjustice attorney Kristen Boyles said, "We're not out of the woods yet. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:36 pm
And, not to brag, but I'm pretty sure we're going to get another $50 added to our budget, which will allow us to invite another 8 people to Harpdrygal V next year. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:28 pm
Supreme Court's most recent pronouncement on obviousness in KSR v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
A decision of the Court of Appeal that was not cited in Westminster was Wood v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [2003] EWHC 2971 (QB). [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:03 am
"Earlier coverage of the case is here; more at the ScotusWiki page for Wood v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 4:46 pm
Q: What are the White House talking points on Ricci v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:33 am
The potential roadblocks -- her involvement in the controversial Ricci v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 1:41 am
NEW YORK COUNTYAdministrative Law Military Law §243 Inapplicable to Petitioner; Respondent's Decision Not Arbitrary Matter of Woods v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:19 am
Diane Wood of CA7 (April 30, 2009) President Obama and the Future of the Supreme Court (December 4, 2008) [read post]