Search for: "The People v. Clark" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,252
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2010, 1:00 am by Colin Murray
A special five judge Court of Appeal panel upheld his conviction (R v Rowe [2007] EWCA Crim 635). [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:01 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"Reasonable restrictions" may be placed on protected speech, especially if the restrictions are not based on content and are "narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest," the judge said, quoting Clark v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm by Steve Bainbridge
(84) Pittsburgh: People were going for DSTs early, so I joined the bandwagon. 10 [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
"When you're dealing with fresh food and real people, you're going to connect people to people. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:05 am by Elie Mystal
Maybe your state lets people from unaccredited schools sit for the exam? [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
It’s amazing what people leave out in plain view for police officers to see, because that’s also the situation in State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 7:58 am by charonqc
Ken Clarke says that he has no plans to cut the prison budget. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 10:31 am by axd10
Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, Phil Clark and Zachary D. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am by Matthew Scarola
” Finally, David Kopel argues in the Washington Times that Justice Sotomayor’s recent dissent in McDonald v. [read post]