Search for: "Toy v. Toy" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2008, 10:00 am
., Serial No. 78664613 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark TRES JOLIE for women's apparel on the ground of likely confusion with the registered marks TRES JOLI and TRES JOLIE for eyeglasses, sunglasses, and eyeglass frames].July 15, 2008 - 10 AM: Kohler Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Third, the Statement of Principles may not even be “expression” under the Charter; it is unclear whether the Statements “attempt to convey meaning” per Irwin Toy Ltd v Québec ([1989] 1 SCR 927), when they are not necessarily shown to anyone ever. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
I am doubtful this is correct, since the skilled person is located in the UK" (referring to Generics v Warner Lambert [2015] EWHC 2548). [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 11:11 pm by Arun Thiruvengadam
I worried that the round-the-clock coverage of Agni V would detract from the much needed focus on the RTE Act, but today's papers provide some reassurance on this score. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 11:20 am
* Toys R Us buys the domain toys.com for over $5M. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
  She saw a toy in the store and, turning to mom said, "can I have that? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:53 am by Michael C. Dorf
And what about goods like poop-themed dog toys? [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Incorporated (IPKat) England’s new shirt sponsors? [read post]