Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS" Results 981 - 1000 of 8,660
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Allen v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
Texas, which found prohibitions on homosexual sex to be unconstitutional, the Court overruled its previous contrary holding in Bowers v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:57 pm by Florian Mueller
Ericsson said some of Apple's claim construction and validity arguments were untimely.ALJ Bhattacharyya's decisions are sealed for the time being, but the following screenshot from the ITC docket shows the outcome (click on the image to enlarge):This is not a good pretrial outcome for Apple.Starting Monday, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas will hold an Ericsson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 1:25 pm by Ajamie LLP
Hanks Jr. issued an order stating he was adopting in full a report and recommendation issued by U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am by Florian Mueller
Haier era to be deemed a willing licensee.A FRAND trial in the Eastern District of Texas will start on Monday, and it won't be easy for Apple to persuade the jury that the royalties it pays to Qualcomm should be ignored.The United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) will also hold an Apple v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm by Samuel Bray
Professor Harrison's work was recently highlighted by Professor Amanda Frost at SCOTUSBlog as one side of a debate critical to United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:14 am by Florian Mueller
Black Friday was not a very eventful day in U.S. patent and antitrust litigation, but the courts were open for business and Ericsson filed a § 1782 discovery motion with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:Ex Parte Application of Telefonaktiebolaget L.M. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 11:40 am by Benson Varghese
State v. $1,760.00 in U.S Currency held that these machines did not fall within the exclusion because the distributed tickets were not redeemable exclusively for noncash merchandise prizes, toys or novelties. [read post]