Search for: "US DEPT JUSTICE"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,680
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2012, 7:13 am
So, let us look at “marriage” in a rational and logical way. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Matter of Cline v Donovan, 72 AD3d 471, 472-472 (1st Dept 2010) (dissolution should not have been granted due to question of fact as to whether petitioner was member of LLC); Caplash v Rochester Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Assoc., LLC, 63 AD3d 1683 (4th Dept 2009) (plaintiff had standing to dissolve LLC because his resignation as member was not effective before he moved for dissolution). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Matter of Cline v Donovan, 72 AD3d 471, 472-472 (1st Dept 2010) (dissolution should not have been granted due to question of fact as to whether petitioner was member of LLC); Caplash v Rochester Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Assoc., LLC, 63 AD3d 1683 (4th Dept 2009) (plaintiff had standing to dissolve LLC because his resignation as member was not effective before he moved for dissolution). [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:27 pm
Jail Population Declines for Third Consecutive Year, Reports Justice Dept. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:05 am
The legislature used another connector: "provided. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
Justices Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels dissented in part in separate memoranda. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
The dissenting justice, who would have upheld the lower court's order enforcing the buy-out at the appraised value, disagreed that the term "Appraiser" as used in the sentence making the "Appraiser's" determination binding applied only to the first-named appraiser. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
The dissenting justice, who would have upheld the lower court's order enforcing the buy-out at the appraised value, disagreed that the term "Appraiser" as used in the sentence making the "Appraiser's" determination binding applied only to the first-named appraiser. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
Liore Lazarus considered the criteria that the courts should use in evaluating the democratic process, while Dr. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 12:31 pm
"Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:31 am
You can read the expose for yourself, entitled “Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:31 am
You can read the expose for yourself, entitled “Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept.” and written by Spenser S. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:09 am
The Washington Post's Spencer Hsu tackles a subject at the federal level ("Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:36 am
Charter of Rights turns Canada into a 'constitutional' trendsetter Skurka's Spin: Charter anniversary must transcend party politics Convicted defendants not told of forensic flaws found by US Justice Dept. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
Dept. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
Dept. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
Dep’t of Criminal Justice v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
The Appellate Division, with two Justices dissenting, reversed and reinstated the action ( 80 AD3d 401 [1st Dept 2011] ). [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:12 am
" (Dept. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Justice Agate cites two of them. [read post]
