Search for: "US v. Bridges"
Results 981 - 1000
of 2,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2008, 7:20 am
The Wallace reversal followed another South Carolina decision from 1923, People v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:38 pm
We wrote a brief together in Elane Photography v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm
Instead, the user can use an alternative platform. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
– Adidas loses against Hungarian inventor in patent suit concerning technology used in soccer shoes (PatLit) India India bends over backwards to protect its traditional knowledge (IP Whiteboard) Fair Dealings by television networks: SCIL v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
– Adidas loses against Hungarian inventor in patent suit concerning technology used in soccer shoes (PatLit) India India bends over backwards to protect its traditional knowledge (IP Whiteboard) Fair Dealings by television networks: SCIL v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:38 am
Miller v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:25 am
Neglecting to use an available safety device can result in dismissal when a defendant proves that a worker's "own conduct, rather than any violation of Labor Law § 240 (1), was the sole proximate cause of [the worker's] accident" (Cahill v Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth., 4 NY3d 35, 40, 823 N.E.2d 439, 790 N.Y.S.2d 74 [2004] [emphasis added]). [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
Today the court hears oral argument in Dean v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:24 am
There is some interaction between the various works in the franchise, in that characters are sometimes put into family or master-disciple lineages that bridge multiple novels. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:37 pm
The FAST Act generally covers roads and bridges, transit, and passenger rail. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
Then the rock is heavier--not in an absolute sense but using common sense. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 1:09 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:15 pm
The court compared it expectation of privacy one would expect if driving across the border in a recreational vehicle used as one's home. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:15 pm
The court compared it expectation of privacy one would expect if driving across the border in a recreational vehicle used as one's home. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:02 pm
Adam Chan discussed how the decision in Torres v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:27 am
The case, Davis v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 10:30 am
MGM Studios Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 10:15 pm
Ed Whelan (Ethics and Public Policy Center) on judicial activism [Fed Soc] Tags: Cato Institute, constitutional law, eminent domain, land use and zoning Related posts Bernstein, “Rehabilitating Lochner” (0) Wyeth v. [read post]
