Search for: "United Property "
Results 981 - 1000
of 46,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2017, 7:48 am
Interessanter Artikel zum Thema AI und Patentschutz / USA: Hier [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The opinion is expected soon, and regardless of how the court rules, it will have a large impact on intellectual property law. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:57 am
The Court next dismissed the United States’ defense that its Executive Order 13599, blocking the property of the Iranian government and related financial entities, fell into two carve outs of the Treaty: measures that regulate the production of or traffic in arms and measures that are necessary for a contracting party’s essential security interests. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
United States, No. 2008-5085 slip op. at 8 (Mar. 25, 2009). [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:35 am
How much control should households have over the environment surrounding the dwelling unit? [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:34 am
The first copyright law in the United States was enacted in this month in 1790, just a few years after the Constitution was adopted. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:04 pm
It is clear that the defendant at bar was not delegated by his superiors to protect any property of the United States Government. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:24 am
Additionally, the Board considered materials submitted by the developers who intended to construct a 140–unit apartment complex on the subject property. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:40 pm
The luncheon speaker will be Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:21 am
” The United States has filed a brief in the case and asked to take part in arguments. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 2:19 pm
Law enforcement may also seize property including computers and cell phones as evidence during an investigation. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Obtaining money, valuable securities or other property by false pretences, when such act is made criminal by the laws of both countries and the amount of money or the value of the property fraudulently obtained is not less than two hundred dollars or one thousand francs. 13. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:28 pm
” Filed under: archaeology law, cultural property law, Elgin Marbles, Repatriation, United Kingdom [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 1:15 pm
Chamber of Commerce Global Innovation Policy Center (GIPC) released its ninth annual International IP Index yesterday, finding that the United States, Japan and Europe remained at the top of the global intellectual property rankings, while emerging markets like the United Arab Emirates, China and Mexico continued to improve their scores. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Embezzlement by public officers; embezzlement by persons hired or salaried, to the detriment of their employers; larceny; obtaining money, valuable securities or other property by false pretenses, or receiving money, valuable securities, or other property, knowing the same to have been embezzled, stolen or fraudulently obtained, when such act is made criminal by the laws of both countries and the amount of money or the value of the property fraudulently obtained or… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:48 am
As in the United States, there is increasing recognition in the United Kingdom that intellectual property laws must be updated and adapted to the modern era, not only to catalyze the information industry, but also to keep vested interests from clogging up the machinery of progress. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 8:51 pm
He obtained little patent protection world-wide, however, only receiving patents in Belgium and the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:03 pm
All to often, landlords use abbreviated lease agreements that are ambiguous, and may not clearly explain what the renter can and cannot do with the unit. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:33 pm
In condominiums, they may be allocated in accordance with the square footage of the unit. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:39 am
An SF95 is used to present claims against the United States under the Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA) for injury to self or property allegedly caused by a federal employee’s wrongful act or omission, so long as that act occurred within the scope of the employee’s federal employment. [read post]
