Search for: "United States v. Andrews" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The lawsuit charges he “is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration. [read post]
In AMG, the Court rejected the FTC’s interpretation of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, which states that the commission “may bring suit in a district court of the United States to enjoin” violations of the law that the FTC enforces. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case involving mandatory deportation, TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am by Smita Ghosh
”In the London Review of Books, Andrew Bacevich covers The General v. the President: MacArthur and Truman at the Brink of Nuclear War by H.W. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am by Lawfare Staff
  In other news… United States Reuters reports that the United States is open to the possibility of joint FON patrols with the Philippines in the South China Sea. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:17 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:37 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am by Aditi Shah
In the Jennings case, Alejandro Rodriguez, a Mexican citizen and lawful permanent resident in the United States, represented a class certified under Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:57 am by Jan Baran
For example, contrary to President Barack Obama’s histrionic warning in his State of the Union speech, Citizens United v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
At Reuters, Andrew Chung reports that “Monday’s ruling added clarity to a powerful defense employed by drug makers that product liability claims brought under state law are preempted by the actions of a federal agency, because federal law generally trumps state law under the U.S. [read post]