Search for: "United States v. Borders"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 4:25 pm
The United States has spoken on this issue in the recent U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:00 am
United States, 598 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:44 am
United States, in which a sentence for selling crack cocaine was reduced below the Federal Guidelines minimum. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am
The nation-to-nation relationship we enjoy as tribal nations has never been confined to the borders of the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 1:50 pm
United States is one of those cases only a lawyer would love or would hate, depending on which side of the dispute you happen to be. [read post]
21 May 2021, 10:20 am
The challengers are a group of U.S. citizens whose smartphones and laptops were searched at the border while they were re-entering the United States from traveling abroad. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:02 pm
By Dennis Crouch US v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 1:41 pm
The City of Hayward, California, was concerned that residential rentals within its borders were "decent, safe, and sanitary," and by ordinance required the owners or tenants of such units to allow city officials to inspect them. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:28 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 9:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
By Order, dated January 14, 2008, United States Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, granted the motion (the "Motion") filed by a group of creditors seeking transfer of venue of the Dunmore Homes, Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
By Order, dated January 14, 2008, United States Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, granted the motion (the "Motion") filed by a group of creditors seeking transfer of venue of the Dunmore Homes, Inc. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 7:27 pm
Understanding the issues in Mexico v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 11:34 am
He referred to the United States' jury-trial right, one that the Court, reversing precedent, held to be fundamental in Duncan v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 9:42 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:49 am
The court ruled in Sanchez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am
United States, in which the court reaffirmed precedent holding that prosecution of the same conduct by separate sovereigns, such as a state and the federal government, does not violate the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause. [read post]
