Search for: "United States v. Edwards" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm by Tara Hofbauer
The National Journal asked foreign policy experts what the United States should do to combat the Islamic State. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Agfeed Industries, Inc., Junhong Xiong, Selina Jin, Songyan Li, Shaobo Ouyang, Edward J. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 8:44 pm by Jon Katz
Unfortunately, today the Virginia Supreme Court placed strict boundaries on the extent to which criminal defendants can benefit from collateral estoppel relief, which is grounded in the United States Constitution’s Double Jeopardy Clause. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:52 am
Evid. 803(6) and United States v Catabran, 836 F.2d 453, 457 (9th Cir. 1988). [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:10 am by Larkin Reynolds
The last time we covered the progress of the case that I’ll call Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Incorporated (IPKat) England’s new shirt sponsors? [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:46 am
  As Wikipedia explains, bankruptcy in the United Statesis a matter placed under federal jurisdiction by the United States Constitution (in Article 1,Section 8, Clause 4), which allows Congress to enact `uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States’. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
The United States Court of Appeals explained its understanding of complexity that should remove a case from the province of the seventh amendment: “A suit is too complex for a jury when circumstances render the jury unable to decide in a proper manner. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost weighs in on Packingham v. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Shawn R. Dominy
  The trial court overruled Strieff’s motion, and the case was ultimately appealed through the Utah state courts to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]