Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 981 - 1000 of 4,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2019, 10:19 am by Adam Feldman
Holder, the decision that ruled Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:12 am by Peter Margulies
Cancellation recognizes longtime LPRs’ deep ties to the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:46 pm by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm case in San Diego said at various investigative hearings held by the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:02 am by Eleonora Rosati
 For example, the definition of integrity is certainly narrower in the United Kingdom, than what is the case elsewhere: under Section 80 (2) CDPA a derogatory "treatment" is indeed required. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:26 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Cleveland, Ohio, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:18 am by Kevin Milewski
  Section 411(a) of the Copyright Act states that “no civil action for infringement of the copyright in any United States work shall be instituted until…registration of the copyright claim has been made in accordance with this title. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 10:56 am by assoulineberlowe
On March 4, 2019, in a long-awaited decision, Justice Ginsberg delivered the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:49 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Baskin-Robbins Franchising is in the business of franchising independent businesses and people to operate Baskin-Robbins shops in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
the smallest saleable patent practising unit (SSPPU) (see Kat friend Richard Vary's comment in the last update here). [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm by Giles Peaker
  The claimants (and Liberty) argued that this should be considered as a ‘modality’ case, as per Bah v United Kingdom (2012) 54 EHRR 21. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:34 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in New Jersey, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 11:26 pm by Florian Mueller
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California decided that Samsung's allegation of Huawei having breached its FRAND licensing obligations will be put before a San Francisco Jury in September, which is precisely what the Chinese plaintiff sought to avoid by means of a motion to strike its Korean rival's jury demand. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 5:46 am
The copyright holder of the image in question, which was captured on October 11, 2018 in New York City is Xclusive (a photo agency that represents over 40 photographers worldwide).Xclusive have now brought a civilcomplaint against Hadid in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York seeking a trial by jury and damages for copyright infringement under the copyright laws of the United States (17 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
This negotiation comes at a time when Section 230 stands under threat in the United States, currently from the SESTA and FOSTA proposals, which could escalate into demands that platforms also assume greater responsibility for other types of content. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:03 am
The roundtable discussion was on the recent decisions of Nigeria’s Supreme Court (SC) in Adeokin v MCSN and Compact Disc v MCSN on the locus standi (right of action) of collective management organisations (CMOs) under the Nigerian Copyright Act. [read post]