Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 981 - 1000
of 7,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2020, 7:56 am
In Eshleman v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Thaddeus Thomas, a minor, et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:53 pm
Lennox states that Conroy did not apply a minority or lack of marketability in her methodology. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
”) State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
This was evident in the fact that the birth rate in the United States fell dramatically from 1800 to 1900. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 12:32 am
10thCir-Denver.jpg In a trial involving aggravated sexual abuse of a minor in Indian country, evidence of the defendant’s prior child molestation convictions, over 20 to 40 years earlier, was admissible under FRE 414 despite the lapse of time between the prior offenses and the current charged conduct because the strong similarity of the incidents made them relevant, in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 1:49 am
HTTP.jpg Internet chatroom conversations about having sex with minors was admissible to show the defendant's knowledge of the age of his victim and absence of mistake under FRE 404(b); a sufficient showing was made that he made the other chats and not other family members who had access to the computer, in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
However, in Rucho v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 4:19 am
United States v. [read post]
COURT: SIXTH AMENDMENT GIVES DEFENDANT THE RIGHT TO HAVE JURY INFORMED OF MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE
28 May 2008, 7:00 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 8:18 am
The "Bar Examinations" section of Kermit Hall's Oxford Companion to American Law (available online to the Duke community) outlines the history and development of the bar examination in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled today that white firefighters who were denied a promotion even though they scored higher on tests than minority counterparts, suffered violations of their civil rights. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm
Because no such requirement exists in Canada, plaintiffs may enjoy a juridical advantage by pursuing their defamation claims in Canada rather than in the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:49 am
See Green Party of Tennessee, et al. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:58 pm
On Friday, ACCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:44 am
” State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:44 am
” State v. [read post]
