Search for: "United States v. Stone"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
BackgroundDonald Creech, Jr. was admitted to Columbia Medical Center for difficulties with kidney stones. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 4:32 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
(Story here.)Statistics compiled by the National Center on Crime and Delinquency, indicate that with about 5% of the world's population, the United States has about 23% of the world's incarcerated people. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:00 pm
(IPKat) Google – Google down to seven AdWord lawsuits – Ascentive v Google dismissed (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 5:21 pm
On December 20, 2002, he passed the first step of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE). [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:21 am
(Ars Technica) New Zealand NZ releases consultation on revised three strikes proposal (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) Nigeria 2 Face Idibia sheds light on music industry in Nigeria (Afro-IP) Norway Pirate Bay block violates democratic principles, says Norway’s largest ISP Telenor (TorrentFreak) Spain Domain name ‘seguridadsocial.es’ finds its (secure) way home (Class 46) Sweden Pirate Bay… [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:40 am
Boudreaux and Prtichard, CIVIL FORFEITURE AND THE WAR ON DRUGS, 33 San Diego L.Rev. 79 (1996); See also One Lot Emerald Cut Stones v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:55 am
United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:04 am
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
Chakrabarty, supra, at 308, quoting United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:38 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:31 am
United States
U.S. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:59 pm
United States), and I have earlier indicated my acceptance of that decision. [read post]
1 May 2009, 12:10 pm
" Stone v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The head of the Manhattan DA's elder abuse unit said Marshall and lawyer Francis X. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:48 am
One of the things that's so interesting about it is that it forced me to reflect on the extent to which the United States Constitution, usually described as "federal," in fact complies with their essential criterion of textually specific assignment of autonomy rights to sub-national units or, as a complement, designs institutions that can plausibly be described as ways of maintaining the federalism bargain. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:50 am
Hypo 2: United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
Stone, 2 Cir., 429 F.2d 138, 140; United States v. [read post]
