Search for: "United States v. That Certain Real Property"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 8:49 pm
The accused are charged with participation in a joint criminal enterprise the purpose of which was the consolidation of total control of the KLA over its operational zone of Dukagjin by attacking and persecuting certain sections of the civilian population there, namely by unlawfully removing Serb civilians from that area, and forcibly and violently suppressing any real or perceived form of collaboration with the Serbs by Albanian or Roma civilians there. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
This is a mess of CLS Bank v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:02 pm
In some instances, such as the important civil rights and property rights case of Buchanan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Likewise, 28% of online adults in the United States use LinkedIn, another website covered by § 14-202.5. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Biden v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
The uniting thread among the various factions within the Progressive Movement was the view that government in the United States had become systematically corrupt. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
The CDC Order “suspending introduction of certain persons” applies to land travel from two countries, Mexico and Canada, and only to those noncitizens defined as “covered aliens. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:08 pm
For "real-world" instances of the kind of retaliation and intimidation groups with similar views as WFA have suffered in the country, one need only look to Justice Thomas's account in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:35 am
As Wikipedia explains, since 1961 the United States has used the exclusionary rule to enforce the protections of the 4th Amendment. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:38 am
Defendants involved with drugs can be charged with federal or state crimes. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
Surprisingly, however, certain aspects of the relevant law remain unclear. ... [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 1:43 pm
Roosevelt UFSD; grants Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 9 01/28/2008 01/28/2008 Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.9 10 S6773 ROBACH -- Relates to compensation benefits and other terms and conditions of employment of certain state officers state officers and employees; repealer;appropriation BLURB : Civ Serv. comp benefits Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 10 01/28/2008 provided that the applicable effective date for Parts A through B shall be as specifically… [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
In the United States Code, for example, there are exemptions: in food inspection laws, allowing the preparation of food in accordance with religious practices, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:32 pm
Republican Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, voted against the stimulus package, stating he did not feel it was good for America. [31] He referred to the plan as a "political stimulus package" [rather] than a real package that would impact our economy in any significant way. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Williams, No. 06-694 A statute criminalizing, in certain specified circumstances, the pandering or solicitation of child pornography is neither overbroad under the First Amendment nor impermissibly vague under the Due Process Clause. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
Apple and Samsung square off in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California again, almost 15 months after their previous trial in the same court resulted in a finding of a multiplicity of infringements of more than half a dozen of Apple's intellectual property rights and awarding Apple more than a billion dollars in damages and more than eight months after Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge presiding over two Apple-Samsung lawsuits in that… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
" Indiana: State v. [read post]
