Search for: "United States v. Walker"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:33 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
– ‘perpetual’ licenses: BMS Computer Solutions Ltd v AB Agri Ltd (IPKat) EWHC: Exclusive jurisdiction clauses and anti-suit injunctions: Skype Technologies SA v Joltid Ltd & others (JIPLP) EWHC finds Newzbin liable for copyright infringement: Twentieth Century Fox v Newzbin Ltd (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (Managing Intellectual Property) Fifth OiNK uploader walks free (TorrentFreak) Warner Bros recruits students to spy… [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:36 pm
“The president, just like any other citizen of the United States, is bound by the law. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
United Techs. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:46 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
In favor of the State &/or Warden (Notable) United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 8:08 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm
In Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 1:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 8:26 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
Like all federal cases, Perry started in a District Court, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
United States, — U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
And if a judge’s personal characteristics were relevant, why shouldn’t the six current United States Supreme Court justices who are Catholics be excluded from ruling on a case about the religious freedom of Catholics? [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:41 am
Nixon, United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 12:42 pm
[Varnum v. [read post]
