Search for: "WAR SHIPPING ADMINISTRATION"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
Our trade deficit is rising, as more and more good jobs get shipped abroad. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
Five more health insurance companies become casualties in the Obamacare war on consumers. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
” (I even included new lyrics to the “Good Ship Titanic” song we all learned as kids.) [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:54 pm
We had to protect shipping lanes, and oil producers. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:41 am
To Wit: No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay. 4. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:56 pm
To Wit: No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay. 4. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:56 pm
To Wit: No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay. 4. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:46 pm
To Wit: No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay. 4. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
As I noted, the editorial specifically addressed the Obama administration’s claim that the law of war justifies Warsame’s detention. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:11 am
As the ACLU says, "the administration continues to assert worldwide war detention authority wherever terrorism suspects are found. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:22 pm
The Administration wants us to believe it is focused on prevention and treatment. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:36 am
I once heard a senior U.S. official say that U.S. exporters can ship without restriction to about 95% of the world. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:02 pm
With rope work worthy of any cowpoke, the Obama Administration has captured itself in its own legal lasso. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:24 am
The first issue is why Warsame was treated as a Prisoner of War at all. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:48 am
Thanks to those disclosures, we now know just how Washington leaned on the Vatican to quell opposition to the Iraq War and just how it pressured the Germans to prevent them from prosecuting CIA agents who kidnapped an innocent man and shipped him off to be tortured abroad. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:57 pm
Apparently, the administration continues to assert worldwide war detention authority wherever terrorism suspects are found. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:31 pm
He was detained lawfully under the Law of War aboard a U.S. navy ship until his transfer to the U.S. for prosecution. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:58 am
That such persons or organizations may be captured outside the confines of the Afghan/Pakistan battlefield has long been a (more or less explicit) part of both Bush and Obama administrations’ readings of that statute, a reading informed (in this administration) by the understanding that the international law of armed conflict (the law of war, IHL) does not prohibit otherwise authorized security-related detention. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Navy ship for two months kept Ben, Rick and Bobby (and probably anyone else covering the war on terror) pretty busy. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:56 am
That such persons or organizations may be captured outside the confines of the Afghan/Pakistan battlefield has long been a (more or less explicit) part of both Bush and Obama administrations' readings of that statute, a reading informed (in this administration) by the understanding that the international law of armed conflict (the law of war, IHL) does not prohibit otherwise authorized security-related detention. [read post]
