Search for: "WARD v. STATE" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
17 May 2022, 2:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Ohio 1995) (accusations of bigotry and homophobia in newspaper opinion piece were nonactionable); Ward v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 11:32 am by Joseph D. Kearney
This was often the case during the period of Ward’s extensive litigation and for many years afterwards. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
In the interest of balance it is worth stating that the Court of Appeal judgment in EKT v News Group Newspapers Ltd on Tuesday ([2011] EWCA Civ 439) is of some importance. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:20 am by Tom Goldstein
In substance, it was that the court had voted to overrule Roe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division then observed that "existing case law has been hesitant to reduce the period of probationary service" for absences during a probationary period such as the probationer's serving on jury duty, referring the court's decision in Tomlinson v Ward, 110 AD2d 537. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division then observed that "existing case law has been hesitant to reduce the period of probationary service" for absences during a probationary period such as the probationer's serving on jury duty, referring the court's decision in Tomlinson v Ward, 110 AD2d 537. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 1:12 am
Ward WESTCHESTER COUNTY Election Law Candidate's Designating Petition for Independence Party for Yonkers City Mayor Invalidated for Fraud Matter of Drace v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:08 am by Hakemi
  At paragraph 7 of its reasons in Lawson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
“In 1989, this Court considered a claim against the State in Sweeney v. [read post]