Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 981 - 1000
of 6,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
" Because we don't want teenagers to have weapons unless they've got a good reason.The shooter here had a hunting license. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 10:00 pm
But I don't see how either of those substantive views I hold counts as a basis for recusing Justice Scalia. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 11:08 pm
" I don't see any similar conflict for Sheriff's deputies running for office as I do assistant district attorneys. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:43 pm
Rules don't apply to them!!! [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:32 pm
In particular, Judge Tashima examines at the studies that plaintiff cites and says that they don't "really" establish that eating Pop Secret's trans fat every month or two causes any physical harm.But, first, I'm not certain that's true. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:42 am
Federal civil procedure rules would allow California law to be applied in cases where the plaintiff's state of residency is different from the defendant's state of residency. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:42 am
"I don't think he is getting treated to the point he wouldn't do it again. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:45 pm
Last week we surprised even ourselves by including Judge Weinstein's December 1 Zyprexa decision as one of top ten best decisions of 2009. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 6:29 am
Here, the officer's suspicion was legitimate because (1) Compton avoided the checkpoint, (2) the checkpoint was near the border and (3) the brothers attempted to conceal the avoidance in a peculiar way.While avoiding a checkpoint is usually not enough by itself to authorize a Terry stop (as some people simply don't like interacting with the police), we can still consider that factor in the analysis. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 5:11 pm
Really, I'm sure I don't know what you're talking about. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:28 am
Well, the question for a lot of people is what do you do if you don't know how to get that information to somebody at a company. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
So instead we'll discuss this and that - various things that we're aware of, but that we haven't gotten around to mentioning. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
Here's one:SECOND UPDATE -- Another sentencing reversal by the same panel with the same district judge here. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
For at least 186 years now, we've been pretending the Double Jeopardy Clause doesn't mean what it says. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
” Well, we don’t know either, but we have to assume that plaintiffs were intelligent enough: (1) to file complaints with fewer than 100 plaintiffs, and (2) not to do anything that smacked of seeking consolidation for trial.Back to the main story. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 12:30 pm
Sixth Circuit: You don't have standing because officials haven't actually pounded on your door. [read post]
26 May 2007, 6:40 pm
Meanwhile a town in Alaska melts- but don't tell the President it's because of global warming, because his henchmen may well just fire you. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:04 am
The trial judge said we don't know the specifics of that federal case, i.e, why the charges were dropped or why the case settled. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 9:00 pm
He added to the defendant: "I don't know if the same offer will be extended to you if you wait until the next court date. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:09 pm
To quote Jim Belushi in that masterpiece of Western cinema About Last Night "At this point, we don't know. [read post]
