Search for: "Will Baude"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2009, 3:25 am
Baude, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 6:59 am
At noon next Thursday (2/6), I will be speaking on the same topic at the University of Chicago School of Law, where my commentator will be my fellow blogger Will Baude. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:13 am
” At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen looks ahead at election law litigation in 2016, predicting that it will include “emergency last minute litigation making it to the Supreme Court as part of whatWill Baude calls the Supreme Court’s ‘shadow docket. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 3:07 pm
Let's hope further appeals courts share that wisdom.The most recent earlier ILB entry on Baude v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:37 pm
. *** Baude, William and Paulsen, Michael Stokes, The Sweep and Force of Section Three (August 9, 2023). [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 9:05 pm
Fiore: “Cert grant for civ pro buffs” [Ann Althouse; more on constitutional limits on personal jurisdiction from Stephen Sachs via Linda Mullenix, Jotwell via Will Baude] California, Wisconsin toughen up lax rules on expert witness admissibility [Bernstein, more] Florida moves to adopt Daubert gatekeeping standard [Maggie Tamburro, Bullseye, William Bissett/Lauren Soble] Lawyer disciplinary proceedings make good occasion for noticing that vague notice pleading can trample… [read post]
5 May 2023, 2:18 pm
Muller also notes another jurisdicitonal wrinkle in this case (also raised by Will Baude): How do North Carolina courts retain jurisdiction over a case that is already subject to Supreme Court review? [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 7:23 am
As some readers likely know, and as Will Baude effectively explains in this new post at The Volokh Conspiracy, "Justice Scalia has been arguing with increasing force that the Act is vague, and the reargument order suggests that there’s a good chance he may finally have convinced his colleagues that he’s right. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:19 pm
Related articles [Will Baude] Jeremy Waldron, on the purpose of constitutional law Jeremy Waldron: Never Mind the Constitution Michael Ramsey [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 2:24 pm
Co-blogger Will Baude has done so at some length. [read post]
31 May 2015, 9:05 pm
Comptroller finds Dormant Commerce Clause forbids double taxation by Maryland, which might have implications for California’s power to regulate the whole world [Michael Greve/Law and Liberty, Daniel Fisher] Ilya Shapiro is keeping score of how many unanimous cases Obama administration has lost before Supreme Court [twenty, as of May 1; American Spectator, auto-plays ad] Spokeo lawsuit under Fair Credit Reporting Act gives Court chance to clarify standing for uninjured plaintiffs [Will… [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:43 am
In an op-ed for The New York Times, William Baude suggests that the Court’s decision to grant review in the case “may have the surprising effect of causing the court to postpone its ruling in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
In addition to my short essay out on this decision ("Querying Edith Windsor, Querying Equality"), which is part of a Villanova Law Review on-line symposium on this decision, I am aware of the following scholars who also have new pieces out on Windsor: 1) Noa Ben-Asher (Pace Law): "Conferring Dignity: The Metamorphosis of the Legal Homosexual" 2) William Baude (Chicago Law): "Interstate Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage after Windsor" 3)… [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:39 am
Briefly: Also at The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses what he describes as “a neglected cert. petition on a very troubling issue,” in Williams v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:03 am
” [Aditya Bamzai on Twitter] University of Chicago Law Review special issue on Justice Scalia [Will Baude; other recent Scalia scholarship includes articles on his influence in implied rights of action and standing] Case on cert petition before SCOTUS could clarify law on distribution of property after church schisms [Samuel Bray on Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am
” Briefly: At The Volokh Conspiracy, Will Baude responds to comments on an earlier post (which I covered in last week’s round-up) regarding the validity of a new rule that prohibits non-lawyers from arguing at the Court. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:49 am
” by William Baude in The Washington Post. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Will Baude weighs in on Supreme Court Justices and the politics of retirement after Richard Re’s post on the topic (which we covered in yesterday’s round-up). [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
William Baude Most constitutional law scholars pay no attention to the field of conflicts of law. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 5:29 pm
.'"] Last year, Will Baude and Steve Sachs, and I, wrote about a proposed Bluebook rule that would require slavery parentheticals. [read post]
