Search for: "Williams v. Downes" Results 981 - 1000 of 4,029
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
And, of course, differences can be exaggerated the farther down the rankings one goes, a reason I also confined this to the “top 50” for now.)POTENTIAL WINNERS, PEER CHANGEGeorge Mason (65 v. 30)BYU (52 v. 23)Alabama (36 v. 25)Florida (31 v. 21)Utah (47 v. 37)Wake Forest (47 v. 37)Texas A&M (56 v. 46)Georgia (36 v. 29)How about the other side? [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
And, of course, differences can be exaggerated the farther down the rankings one goes, a reason I also confined this to the “top 50” for now.)POTENTIAL WINNERS, PEER CHANGEGeorge Mason (65 v. 30)BYU (52 v. 23)Alabama (36 v. 25)Florida (31 v. 21)Utah (47 v. 37)Wake Forest (47 v. 37)Texas A&M (56 v. 46)Georgia (36 v. 29)How about the other side? [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
At ACSblog, Deborah Roy discusses the legacy of Justice William Brennan – also the topic of her new book. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 5:28 am
In Live Nation Motor Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:32 am
Continuing its somewhat puzzling approach (and voting paterns) in ACCA cases, the Supreme Court today in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 3:50 am
William Patry, an eminent American copyright lawyer and blogger, commented on the case at the appellate stage (shortly before he shut his blog down), and there is a valuable exchange of comments following that post as well. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am by Amy Howe
Four justices – Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Clarence Thomas – agreed in Vieth v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
In the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams critiques the court’s expansion of Title VII in Bostock v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:43 am by NCC Staff
In 1978, Justice William Brennan wrote for a 6-3 majority in the Penn Central v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 4:03 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  HMD, who is the exclusive licensee for Nokia-branded phones, alleged that VoiceAge EVS does not comply with EU law, as laid down by the CJEU in Huawei v ZTE (C-170/13). [read post]