Search for: "York v York" Results 981 - 1000 of 52,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 6:00 am by Cari Rincker
”  Pure Air and Water Inc. of Chemong County v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:35 pm by Karen Gullo
In the case before the New York court, People v Perkins, border agents stopped a traveler at JFK International Airport after a flight from Canada. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 2:47 am by Alex Brandt and Ron Clark
On 25 October 2017, the English Supreme Court handed down judgment in Mitsui & Co Ltd and Others v Beteiligungsgesellschaft LPG Tankerflotte MBH & Co KG and Another (The “Longchamp”). [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:09 pm by Michel-Adrien
" Reaction to the 2017 Federal Court decision includes:Court Decision a Big Win for Creators and Publishers (Access Copyright, July 12, 2017)Ignoring the Supreme Court: Federal Court Judge Hands Access Copyright Fair Dealing Victory (blog post by Michael Geist, University of Ottawa, July 13, 2017) Access Copyright v York University (Fair Dealing in Education blog, July 13, 2017)Access Copyright v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 4:31 am by Peter Mahler
New York: Congel v Malfitano In Congel v Malfitano, a 3% partner of a general partnership that owned a large shopping mall in Poughkeepsie, New York, acting under the assumption that the partnership was at-will, gave notice of dissolution of the partnership under Section 62 (1) (b) of New York’s Partnership Law providing that a partner may cause dissolution “without violation of the agreement between the partners . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 2:20 am by Jeremy Saland
In People v Consalvo, 89 NY2d 140 (1996), the Court of Appeals considered a trial court’s failure to hold such a hearing after it was requested by the defendant, as well as the lack of necessary evidence supporting the finding that the State of New York had had losses of at least $500,000 due to the defendant’s fraudulent Medicaid billing. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 2:20 am by Jeremy Saland
In People v Consalvo, 89 NY2d 140 (1996), the Court of Appeals considered a trial court’s failure to hold such a hearing after it was requested by the defendant, as well as the lack of necessary evidence supporting the finding that the State of New York had had losses of at least $500,000 due to the defendant’s fraudulent Medicaid billing. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:29 am by David G. Badertscher
Goldstock NEW YORK COUNTYLegal Profession Recovery for Emotional Distress In Malpractice Actions Is Denied Taylor v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 2:14 am by Jeremy Saland
” This was exactly the question faced by by the New York County Supreme Court, Criminal Term in People v. [read post]