Search for: "1-8 Doe"
Results 9981 - 10000
of 32,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2016, 6:09 am
The “OFCCP plans to utilize [the EEOC’s proposal for] EEO-1 pay data [collection] for federal contractors with 100 or more employees instead of implementing a separate compensation data survey as outlined in its August 8, 2014, NPRM,” the EEOC proposal states in a footnote (#63). [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
In arguing that Oregon Revised Statutes §260.715(9) violates Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution, defendant asserted, among other things, that the statute directly regulates speech and is not wholly contained within a well-established historical exception to section 8's protections.The trial court denied defendant's demurrer. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
The text for Article 8, which is a qualified right, provides as follows: 1. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 2:20 pm
If your hands hurt as much as mine does, I'd rather conserve movement for academic writing and knitting and cooking. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:42 am
The appeal board does not side with the unlucky second party; for transfers it is first come first serve. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 7:26 am
It does not represent an official position of the GSSB. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:04 am
The purpose of the Working Party’s Opinion 8/2010 (the “Opinion”) is twofold. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:08 am
” Specifically, Appellant has shown news publication, promotional materials, and screen shots which show an online testing center (FF 1-1), adding new or editing existing test questions (FF 7-1), a fee for the test-taker (FF 11-1), revenue sharing (FF 5-2, 8-1), and private user accounts (FF 2-1, 3-2, 9-1). [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 6:01 am
This does not mean you are out of luck. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 6:01 am
This does not mean you are out of luck. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 1:40 pm
Aug. 8, 2011), in which the Court rendered a plaintiff-friendly ruling bearing upon the type of discovery that an employer must face in a nationwide workplace bias class action. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 6:09 am
Charlie does not expect any of the EB-1 categories to become current at any time in the foreseeable future. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Nor does it produce any different result from that under Article 8. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 3:10 pm
Consider the following. 1. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
In short, article 23 of the Directive does not distinguish between pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am
It emphasised that whilst it was only obligated to “take into account” decisions of the European court, where there is a clear and constant line of decisions ”whose reasoning does not appear to overlook or misunderstand some argument or point of principle” it would be “wrong” for the court not to follow that line [48]. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 3:47 pm
As to Forms 8-K and 10-Q, Plaintiff attempted to argue in Benett that the anti-SLAPP statute does not apply because unlike Form 10-K, Forms 8-K and 10-Q are not specifically designed to trigger an SEC investigation. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am
By a majority of 6:1 the Chamber held that the failure of the applicant’s domestic defamation claim was a breach of the positive obligation of the respondent State to protect the applicant’s Article 8 right to reputation. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:20 pm
In response, the government pivots to argue instead that the motion should be denied because: (1) defense counsel may gain access to the contents of the tape by asking bin Attash directly what he said; (2) the contents of the tape are irrelevant to determining conditions of confinement—only whether the tape was delivered or not goes to that issue; and (3) the government can’t control the contents of the tape once it has been released to the defense. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
§ 227(b)(1)(C). [read post]
