Search for: "C N And R"
Results 9981 - 10000
of 10,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) District Court N D Illinois: Unrelated sales do not create specific jurisdiction: Merrill Primack v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:48 pm
Public Resources Code section 21167(c) states that an action challenging the adequacy of an EIR must be filed within 30 days after posting of the NOD. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:01 am
” See C and J Leasing Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 2:01 pm
C. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
C at 4), began to reach down to retrieve his credentials. [read post]
8 May 2015, 10:41 am
Otherwise, “[n]o rights or property would be safe from the State. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
Nextel (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Failure to reverse-engineer accused products threatens infringement claim: Bender v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:35 pm
Thus, the Meyer court "decline[d] to extend Kagan to situations in which an allegedly unlawful practice under the CLRA has not resulted in some kind of tangible increased cost or burden to the consumer," and it expressly disapproved of Kagan's dictum that "'we interpret broadly the requirement of section 1780 that a consumer "suffer[] any damage" to include the infringement of any legal right as defined by section 1770.'" … [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm
Dep’t of Transp., 42 F.3d 517, 524 n.6 (9th Cir. 1994) (EIS may incorporate state studies). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm
By refusing to analyze plaintiffs’ “on duty” argument as the basis for its predominance inquiry because “there c[ould] be no assurances that they w[ould] prevail on this theory,” the district court ignored Ninth Circuit precedent and ultimately abused its discretion. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:36 am
Importantly, it was noted that these security measures are equally applicable to the traditional law office setting: “(A)n attorney using cloud computing is under the same obligation to maintain client confidentiality as is the attorney who uses non-online documents management... [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:29 pm
—Dallas 2008, pet. denied) (holding that statutory limitations on contractor’s recoverable damages imposed by section 271.152 did not deprive trial court of subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate breach of contract claim); City of N. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 12:36 pm
Unlike with state law, “[n]either [the appellate court] nor the trial court may take judicial notice of municipal ordinances[.] [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 6:43 am
., Nilavar v Osborn, 711 N. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 12:05 am
" "[I]n June 2010 the German federal government notified us of its decision not to provide loan guarantees to Opel/ Vauxhall. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 12:37 pm
He serves in Enforcement and Removal Operations at the Dallas Field Office at 8101 N. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:11 am
Photo "Fight the power" courtesy of Flickr user C-Monster, licensed under a CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Next, based on some language contained in Navarro Savings Ass’n v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Interestingly, the decision by Justice Mariano Del Castillo begins with a quotation from a United States Supreme Court opinion by Justice Robert C. [read post]
