Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 9981 - 10000
of 30,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Subchapter V Decision Tracker Refer to this tracker for the latest case law on Subchapter V. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Scuderi-Hunter v County of Delaware, 202 AD3d at 1317, quoting Matter of Young v Village of Gouverneur, 145 AD3d 1285, the court declined to disturb the penalty imposed, Petitioner's dismissal from his position. * The record contains a copy of ACC's written code of conduct and a certification by Petitioner acknowledging its receipt. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
Board of Education and Brown v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
Put differently, an inventive step (a necessary component for being able to patent something) cannot include something that is 'obvious' to a person skilled in the art, having considered anything that forms the state of the art in which they are skilled in.Typically the courts follow two tests on determining obviousness; (i) the Windsurfing/Pozzolli structure; and (ii) the EPO's problem-and-solution method.The question of obviousness, as set out in Conor Medsystems Inc… [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:29 am
In State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Judge Minora ended his opinion by stating that "All parties are entitled to a fair, objective and impartial jury of their peers, but not to a jury of their choosing. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
Put differently, an inventive step (a necessary component for being able to patent something) cannot include something that is 'obvious' to a person skilled in the art, having considered anything that forms the state of the art in which they are skilled in.Typically the courts follow two tests on determining obviousness; (i) the Windsurfing/Pozzolli structure; and (ii) the EPO's problem-and-solution method.The question of obviousness, as set out in Conor Medsystems Inc… [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am
Zerbst, and Gideon was a decision about incorporating the right and applying it to the states. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 10:53 am
It just needs to be fair. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Citing a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Francis v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:59 am
Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 1:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:48 pm
-Impact Fees/Fair Shares? [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 2:36 pm
Norvil v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 3:00 am
" Angelucci v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 5:22 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 5:22 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
The SJC opinion further states that the fairness and accuracy privilege should be liberally construed by courts. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:04 pm
The majority concluded, following a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Luckey v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:37 am
In anticipation of the Supreme Court's hearing Florida v. [read post]
