Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 9981 - 10000
of 61,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2007, 5:58 am
The Court determined that, based upon the clear language of Section 9-106 of the Education Article, the State Board may only grant waivers of provisions applying to all public schools, and not those specific to just public charter schools, and therefore Title 9's provisions were not subject to waiver under Section 9-106(b). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm
(UK) Ltd. v J.P. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2004, 2:51 pm
See Edith Hamilton, Mythology 86 (1942).United States v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:00 am
It’s important to note that in Murphy v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 5:46 am
In Gilbert v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:34 am
By Glen Hansen In Brandt Trust v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:53 pm
In another case the Court stated that: The court's failure to grant adjournment to permit defense counsel to recover from medical surgery was improvident exercise of discretion in absence of any indication by plaintiff that it would have been prejudiced by delay in commencement of trial. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 2:28 pm
Finally, in the Court’s first case on the Affordable Care Act (NFIB v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
A.C. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:54 am
This decision came after the recent Illinois Supreme Court ruling striking down part of the state's gun law as unconstitutional (People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 pm
Circuit last week in Farah et al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 6:10 am
In Scott v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:05 am
In Fuldwider v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 9:00 am
See Op. and Order, McGlone v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
In Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:23 am
The complaint (full text) in Maddonna v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:58 am
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's ANDA induced infringement claim for failure to state a claim based on defendant's marketing and sales. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
In Cowles v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Had Defendant granted Plaintiff’s request for an exemption, it would have been in direct violation of New York State law, thus suffering an undue hardship.The court also rejected plaintiff's 1st Amendment free exercise claim because defendant is not a state actor. [read post]
