Search for: "In Interest of C." Results 9981 - 10000 of 42,091
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2019, 10:55 pm
 Post GDPR protected postImage: Loïc GERBAUDPerhaps Associated Newspapers will rebut with an argument that these breaches of privacy and data protection were necessary for the public interest, which can apply for example if it supports or promotes democratic engagement. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Finally, the Port denied the allegation that it was the Project proponent, raising questions about the [CC&C’s] admission and warranting further inquiry. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:47 pm by Michel Paradis
In choosing to impeach, Parliament sought to repudiate as a matter of law the l’état c’est moi notion that the office of the king and the person of the king were indivisible. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 6:18 am by Keegan Boyle
The original suit, filed in 2018, was dismissed by High Court Judge Warby because “(a) none of the represented class had suffered ‘damage’ under section 13 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (the ‘DPA’), (b) the members of the class did not anyway have the ‘same interest’ within CPR Part 19.6(1) so as to justify allowing the claim to proceed as a representative action, and (c) the judge of his own initiative exercised his discretion under CPR… [read post]
As a CEO, it’s your job to ensure that you address change management head-on and refuse to let the C-suite talk you into settling for small improvements. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am by INFORRM
The CJEU recognised that, in a globalised world, access by internet users outside the EU to a link referring to information regarding a person whose centre of interests is within the EU is likely to have an impact on that person within the EU, and so global delinking would meet the objective of EU data protection law. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 7:38 pm by J. Michael Young
  Chapter 123 of the Texas Estates Code establishes a procedure to declare certain marriages void after the death of one spouse: (a) Subject to Subsection (c), if a proceeding described by Section 123.101(a) is not pending on the date of a decedent's death, an interested person may file an application with the court requesting that the court void the marriage of the decedent if:(1) on the date of the decedent's death, the decedent was married; and(2) that… [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 8:26 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
  (c) Answer to Issue: No as to the 401(k) withdrawal; yes as to tax due on the husband’s income. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 5:26 am
In conclusion, art. 1.C runs against the exhaustion rule and is therefore void. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 8:07 pm by Sam Turco
Does Bankruptcy Rule 9011 and Bankruptcy Code Section 707(b)(4)(C) apply? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am by Carolina Attorneys
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am by Carolina Attorneys
SKJONSBY Opinion of the Court – 4 – interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections. [read post]