Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 9981 - 10000
of 10,077
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm
JOHN DOE, Defendant.Case Number: O-2004-1175COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA2006 OK CR 1; 127 P.3d 1135; 2006 Okla. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 1:27 am
If anyone wants to lend me seasons 1, 2, or 3 of the Wire, please do! [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 6:12 pm
See, e.g., In re Ennco Display Systems, Inc., 56 USPQ2d 1279, 1283 (TTAB 2000).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 6:17 am
Hence without further adieu, That Lawyer Dude Salutes:1. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 2:19 am
2. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 5:14 pm
The TTAB had the last ho-ho-ho when it affirmed the PTO's Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register Mistletoe Technologies' mark FABLESS SOFTWARE COMPANY. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 1:14 pm
Gabe Keri, a 25-page, 2-1 opinion, Judge Najam writes:Suzanne Swinehart and Virginia Hartman bring this interlocutory appeal following the trial court's denial of their motion for summary judgment. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 6:27 pm
It does not help that Sam's life sounds so much more interesting than mine, but here goes: 1. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
(July 2, 2006)33. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 7:12 pm
"The Board therefore affirmed the Section 2(e)(1) refusal.TTABlog note: For a discussion of the Board's two-headed genericness test, which treats compound words and phrases differently, see the TTABlog posting here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:12 pm
Apparently recognizing that American consumers are not as dumb as they look, the Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal of the mark SMART SENSOR, finding it merely descriptive of "interactive electric action toys. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:22 am
State Citation: 2006 WY 157 Docket Number: 05-291 & 06-1 Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County (No. 05-291), the Honorable John Perry, Judge Appeal from the District Court of Sheridan County (No. 06-1), the Honorable John C. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 3:57 am
It does not. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 3:12 pm
In In re Taylor Tate, Inc., Serial No. 78463524 (December 1, 2006) [not citable], the Board found Applicant's spa services to be related to hair and skin care products, and it consequently affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown immediately below [DAY SPA & SHOP disclaimed] in light of the registered mark LOVJOI.Examining Attorney Ingrid C. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
John Fisher and if he continues to run like that against Whitewater in the finals, Mount Union will win going away.2. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 11:39 am
This case is noteworthy because it extended the landmark Second Circuit 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 11:22 pm
John and I and his boys grabbed Jim (he was no small guy - about 250 normally; figure about 300 pounds with the water-logged clothes he was wearing) when he was in about 1 - 1 1/2 feet of water and dragged him to the snowmachine. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 1:47 am
ENCOURAGE TELECOMMUTING.What does that have to do with data security? [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:03 pm
But button-wearing spectators do not clearly pose an unacceptable risk because (1) most courts have upheld convictions despite the presence of button wearers, and (2) victims may have a First Amendment right to wear "mourners' buttons" that would justify some level of risk to the defendant's rights. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 5:13 pm
"Text Copyright John L. [read post]
