Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 9981 - 10000 of 36,784
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2019, 6:55 am by Jonathan Holbrook
The district court is authorized to accept H and I felony pleas pursuant to a Criminal Information by G.S. 7A-272(c)(1) and 15A-644.1. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:51 am by Daniel Shaviro
A 2014 paper by Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page has a neat chart showing the effects on the probability of a policy’s being adopted changes as support for it rises among (a) average citizens, (b) economic elites, and (c) organized interest groups.For (a), the general public, the line is flat – rising public support for a proposal from 0 towards 100% has almost no effect whatsoever on the likelihood of adoption. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:21 pm by Bill Purdy
  Bill and his partner Pam Simmons are my go-to resource for all matters of tax and mortgage law. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:13 pm by Keahn Morris and John Bolesta
The Administrative Law Judge hearing the matter agreed with the union’s charges, sustaining the claims on all three counts. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:16 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In decision T 315/03 (relating to what has become Rule 28(1)(d) EPC) theBoard fully acknowledged the Administrative Council’s competence to interpretArticle 53(a) EPC by amendment to the Implementing Regulations based onArticle 33(1)(c) EPC without being limited in this regard by an interpretation ofthe Article set forth in earlier case law.10. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:30 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
The trial court had reasoned that the lawsuit sought to enforce rights owned by the corporation and that allowing the plaintiff to collect directly from the defendant would prejudice the corporation’s creditors, reasoning as follows: Although this [c]ourt does have the discretion to treat [p]laintiff’s claim as a direct action since IFP was a closely held corporation, the fact that IFP has creditors who are still seeking recovery from IFP funds precludes [p]laintiff’s… [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 230(c)(1) generally immunizes intermediaries, such as search engines or online service providers, that do have money. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 230(c)(1) generally immunizes intermediaries, such as search engines or online service providers, that do have money. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Details will matter as will implementation. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Want guidance on responsibilities.Robert Schwartz Consumer Technology Association: Toleration, accommodation, and implied license matter a lot. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 10:11 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
If a real estate document filed in the public record is found to be fraudulent, it is void as a matter of law. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Midgley: We get notices styled as (c) but they’re really (a)—this is content that flowed through our network but we have no way of verifying whether it was actually there since we don’t store the content, as per 512(a)’s requirements. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
B/c a court said the DMCA means what it says, and that hasn’t happened before b/c courts have not required a representative list or applied red flag notice. [read post]