Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 9981 - 10000 of 14,178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2012, 2:06 pm by Antoinette Konski
Everyone – from licensed patent attorneys, to scientists, to the public in general – appears to have an opinion on the issue of gene patenting, especially as framed by the ACLU – “are human genes patentable? [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:21 pm by Kandace Watson
Please contact your Sheppard Mullin attorney contact for additional information.* [1] Marchand v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Is attorney-client privilege constitutional? [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am by Anthony Gaughan
” The reason is because the effort to ascertain a universally-applicable, general common law came to an end in the famous 1938 case of Erie Railroad Company v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
The doctrine has been approved by the High Court of Australia: Potter v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1906) 3 CLR 479; [1906] HCA 88; Attorney-General (United Kingdom) v Heinemann Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 30; [1988] HCA 25. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:31 am by Martin A. Schwartz
However, the court’s analysis appears at odds with generally accepted legal principles. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
The original image, found online, shows a sign reading “Boycott bigotry”. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
  (Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in Lane.) [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
If you’ve made it this far, congratulations – you’ve already read more than the average American reads in a year. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:54 am by Charon QC
In Balogh, Lord Denning stated that, where there was not this urgency, the most appropriate course was to refer the matter to the Attorney General so that he or she could consider bringing proceedings in the Queen’s Bench Division. [read post]
16 May 2016, 11:35 am by Mark Walsh
She explains the unanimous decision holding that the use of letterhead belonging to the Ohio attorney general by special counsel engaged in debt collection does not offend the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:54 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court stripped tribal governments of their criminal authority over non-Indians in Oliphant v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:59 am by Brian E. Barreira
 In 2017, the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that such a SPA in a deed is a valid transfer; see Reservation of Special Power of Appointment in Deed Is Approved by Massachusetts Appeals Court in 2017 Case of Skye v. [read post]