Search for: "State of New York v. United States" Results 9981 - 10000 of 16,016
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The Circuit invited the views of the United States, since “aspects of the appeal . . . might have implications for the conduct of the foreign relations of the United States”. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:32 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
HSI seizes the dinosaur bones.Today's court conference in the matter of United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
The Frye standard is still used in a number of states, including Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
The Frye standard is still used in a number of states, including Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:59 am by Eric Osterberg
A  judge in the Western District of New York (think Buffalo) wrote last week in a case between two beauty pagaent promoters, Mrs. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
Alabama decided that the NAACP, which had been organized in New York, was a foreign corporation operating in Alabama. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
Alabama decided that the NAACP, which had been organized in New York, was a foreign corporation operating in Alabama. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am by Cormac Early
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has video of a recent conference of privacy law scholars on the “mosaic theory” of Fourth Amendment searches, which was embraced by the two concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm by Eric Osterberg
A  judge in the Western District of New York (think Buffalo) wrote last week in a case between two beauty pagaent promoters, Mrs. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
” So why, pray tell, are the ACLU and CCR suing Panetta, Petraeus, McRaven, and Votel — but not the president of the United States? [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:09 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
The case was heard by the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:55 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
  Fox moved to dismiss all the claims except the copyright claim, stating that “the claims are preempted by section 301 of Title 17 of the United States Code (the Copyright Act), fail to state a claim as a matter of law, or both. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:51 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
  Fox moved to dismiss all the claims except the copyright claim, stating that “the claims are preempted by section 301 of Title 17 of the United States Code (the Copyright Act), fail to state a claim as a matter of law, or both. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:45 am by Tiffany Blofield
United States National Pageant, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:15 pm by Sean Dugan
In New York, between 400 and 1000 voters were alleged to have voted once in New York and once in Florida. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  o. 11 Civ. 6155 (LTS)(JLC)  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK   2012 U.S. [read post]