Search for: "State v. Self" Results 9981 - 10000 of 15,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, I think a major virtue of written constitutions is their capacity to limit the capacity of rulers to engage in self-dealing. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:59 pm
As Rogan rightly states, “In Sen’s work, the two critiques [i.e., the ‘moral’ and the ‘material’] of capitalism cooperate. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 8:47 am by Jane Bambauer
While the earnest, true believers of conspiracy theories go to jail for action taken in the real world, the self-serving leaders of their movements guard themselves in plausible deniability, protected from the justice system. [read post]
’[12] He even relies on the inclusion of the UDHR in the preamble of the Refugee Convention as evidence that ‘[protection against non] discrimination was a fundamental purpose of the Convention’ (emphasis added).[13] He then goes on to affirm the right of a gay man to freedom of association and to freedom of self-expression. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWCA Civ 1073, dismissing by a majority the appeal from the decision of Nicol J, which struck out the Appellant’s claims in libel and data protection as abuse. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Graeme Hall
AJ (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1191 (27 July 2011… Court of Appeal dismisses 3 joined asylum appeals: welfare of children was sufficiently taken into account. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:55 am
 Here I take no position on whether recent protect-the-speech-we-hate decisions like United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm by Lesley Wexler
The Convention on Conventional Weapons Protocol V (on Explosive Remnants of War) also regulates US use of cluster munitions, as it is a state party to this international treaty. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]