Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 9981 - 10000
of 19,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 9:46 am
Although Alice Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
V. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:09 pm
I'm tempted to say "slow news day," but it apparently wasn't slow to the editors of the HT: We've got a four-column, triple deck headline on the story out of the Supreme Court (this was a Tuesday morning): T.V.A Wins Right to Sell Power In 8-1 Supreme Court Decision Applying Only to Wilson DamMore formally, that would be Ashwander v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:08 pm
These were mighty battles over justice with enormous consequences. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:56 am
Subsequently, however, the court of appeals decided United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:45 am
Therefore, the Court decided that Russia could not extradite Klein because he would face "a danger of ill-treatment" in Colombia, given that "the evidence[xvii] […] demonstrates that problems still persist in Colombia in connection with the ill-treatment of detainees. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
However, that did not stop the Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Trump appointee Justice Neil Gorsuch and joined by Bush II appointee Chief Justice John Roberts, from holding in 2020 in Bostock v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
For example, in Bruni v Bruni Justice Quinn demonstrates the limits of a court’s patience for families with chronic legal issues. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:59 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Wormell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:43 pm
[Page 13] That said, Justice Kennedy still voted with the liberal bloc more than he did at any time in the last ten years of the Rehnquist Court. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 4:08 pm
The decision of the European Court of Justice in Svensson v Retriever Sverige AB (Case C‑466/12, 13 February 2014) has established some important points about the legality of linking under EU copyright law: A clickable direct link to a copyright work made freely available on the internet with the authority of the copyright holder does not infringe. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:35 pm
When the law is undefined, justices must still issue opinions. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 1:06 pm
Justices agreed with the trial court’s application of the 1995 court ruling, which resulted in a legal doctrine that is now referred to as the “McHaffie Rule” (after the case of McHaffie v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:40 am
Malcolm v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:31 am
" And still 72 pages to go! [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:05 am
Readers may remember this dispute as Sun Microsystems Inc v M-Tech Data Ltd and another (noted by the IPKat here), but it has resurfaced today -- at a time when Court of Appeal judges should be out in the sun, not judging it -- as Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein [2010] EWCA Civ 997. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 6:55 pm
Earlier this year the Supreme Court examined the responsibility to appoint counsel in the Texas case Rothgery v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
Helix Energy Solutions Group v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:08 pm
And then there is Vaughn v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm
" Some courts have accepted the argument that such subsequent developments as the Supreme Court's pro-gay rulings in Romer v. [read post]
