Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9981 - 10000
of 13,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2021, 6:15 pm
Campbell Soup Co., Alabama state court, and Andrade-Heymsfield v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 8:44 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:00 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 1:18 pm
The first case, United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
United States, 251 U.S. 385. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:19 am
[T]he new couple traveled to the United States, following the execution of necessary visas and other related paperwork so that [the wife] could reside here. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed (further to a motion by the merging parties) to schedule up to five trial days, the first one of which will be Thursday (June 22). [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:46 pm
By Sherry Colb In my column for this week, I discuss the case of Plata v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:49 pm
At no time did I tell him that the film would not air in the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
California, as applied to Belton. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
Libyan officials suggested that French forces are fighting alongside Libyan troops as they battle against the Islamic State, while Reuters reports that “French special forces and intelligence commandos are engaged in covert operations against Islamic State militants in Libya in conjunction with the United States and Britain. [read post]
9 May 2022, 7:24 am
In South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 2:24 pm
Hamilton (10th Cir. 1995) (upholding a Kansas criminal defamation statute as facially valid after interpreting it to require actual malice); see generally United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, is scheduled to hear a motion for preliminary approval of the record data breach settlement in the Anthem class action case. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
California, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that police must first obtain a warrant to search the contents of someone’s cell phone in all but the most extraordinary circumstances. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 2:37 pm
Privacy is a fundamental interest that society has long championed in the United States, and it is that reverence that has caused some to react negatively to a recent 9th Circuit holding that seemingly abridged the constitutionally protected right.1 In the unpublished decision of U.S. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:12 am
United States, No. 4:18-cv-00167-O (N.D. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:45 pm
Hinderaker speculates that some or all of the four conservatives justices who dissented in United States v. [read post]
