Search for: "1 Supplement Store" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,042
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2008, 4:59 pm
  The Respondent was already required to bargain over the effects of its decision to close two stores. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
At the time of the hearing, FS operated nine stores and employed approximately 500 employees. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
"The article in question must be from the ordinary publication, and not from any "special supplement. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 7:30 am
Brain Quest: This popular educational game is available at different levels for grades 1-7. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
I think not: (IP ThinkTank),European Commission launches consultation on ‘Content Online in the Single Market': (IPKat), (Out-Law), (IPR Helpdesk),Norway and Croatia join the European Patent Organisation: (IP Menu News),EU joins Hague system for the international registration of industrial designs: (Catch us if you can)IndiaNational Knowledge Commission calls for an overhaul of India's patent process:… [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 5:33 am
(For Obama in 2004 on abolishing mandatory minimums, see this video clip at 1:00 minute in.) [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 2:26 pm
  The email dispute was first brought to the court's attention in August 2006, when the plaintiffs moved to compel supplemental discovery responses from the County. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:03 am
But that was before July 1, when a change was made in the law by House Enrolled Act 1379. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
No exceptions were filed to the judge's findings that the Respondent committed five Section 8(a)(1) violations. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
Charge filed by Professional Employees Local 2001; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(5) and (1). [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 11:06 am
Use multi-vitamins & fish oil supplements if you want. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
"  Ross Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 10:53 am
Plaintiff claims the Plan's formula for calculating these supplemental profit-sharing payments thus violated California statutes, rules, and decisions that prohibit an employer from shifting certain of its costs to employees by withholding, deducting, or recouping them from wages or earnings, or otherwise obliging employees to contribute to them.Slip op. at 1. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
  The case involves Vitamins Home's alleged "engage[ment] in the unauthorized use of the Young Again™ Mark by utilizing the Mark in pay-for-placement and pay-for-rank search engine advertising to direct Internet customers to its on-line nutritional supplement store. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 10:01 pm
Vitamins Home, Case Number 1:2007cv02073, filed Aug. 3, 2007 Plaintiff Young Again Products, Inc., a Maryland company that describes itself as being "in the business of production and sale of health and nutritional supplements," has sued Vitamins Home, an Israeli company with a place of business in Texas, for allegedly "engag[ing] in the unauthorized use of the Young Again™ Mark by utilizing the Mark in pay-for-placement and pay-… [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
Bill's Electric, Inc. (17-CA-18629-1, et al: 350 NLRB No. 31) Webb City, MO July 24, 2007. [read post]