Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2014, 10:48 am by emagraken
Future loss of earnings is an assessment and there is no deduction for income tax: Arnold v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 3:13 am by Walter Olson
Arnold Kling’s prescriptions for getting the government out of the mortgage market; Mini-symposium on the personal benefit standard for insider trading in the recent Supreme Court case of Salman v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 10:24 am by Heather Wallace
The state high court’s August 22 decision not to review the case leaves unchanged the April 14 appeals court ruling in Vergara v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
"' Today, The Sacramento Bee reports, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger intends to file a court-mandated plan to address overcrowding in California prisons. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 7:16 am
Well, now it has been reported, as Williams v Thompson Leatherdale (a firm) & Anor [2008] EWHC 2574 (QB) (thanks, Current Awareness). [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:29 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual PropertyInfringement Action Over Common Phrase's Use In Fictional Legal TV Show's Promotion Dismissed Arnold v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
This, together with other issues, is what Arnold J had been asked to determine in Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC & Another v WPMC Ltd & Another [2015] EWHC 1853 (Ch) (1 July 2015), an intriguing case decided earlier this week, having to do with the Beatles and a documentary concerning their first US concert ever. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
Justice Arnold courtesy of the US Copyright Office who is again reviewing the problem of orphan works. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
Back in mid-January (sorry for the delay in reporting this decision, dear IPKat readers), Mr Justice Arnold handed down his judgment in the long-standing easy trade mark battle: W3 Ltd v Easygroup Ltd & Anor [2018] EWHC 7.The core issue was whether the sign “EasyRoommate” and its variants which were owned by the Claimant, W3, infringed any of the the easyGroup's EU trade marks. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
 Following a full and magisterial analysis of the relevant law, Arnold J dismissed the application. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:57 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
| US Supreme Court rules Official Georgia Codes Annotated is ineligible for copyright protection - Georgia v. [read post]