Search for: "B. Thomas and Company" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2015, 12:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
   Thomas Brooks, Holland & Knight: IP is more than patents—often a misconception that people have. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:13 am
Arnold, III CFLS Some years ago at an AFCC conference in Denver, I had the privilege to sit with Judge Thomas Trent Lewis and others during one of the dinner events. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
See Kalinow­ski §12.02[1]; Areeda & Hovenkamp §15.02[B]; Capital Imaging Assoc., supra, at 543. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
Raising the price on side A risks losing participa­tion on that side, which decreases the value of the plat­form to side B. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am by Law Lady
Child support -- Modification -- Administrative support order -- Trial court fundamentally erred when it reduced father's monthly child support obligations without notice or hearingDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Loretta Sermon, Cherral Smith, and Yata Frichelle Canty, Appellant, v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:08 am by slkimbro
” from “Strategy and the New Economics of Information” by Evans, Philip B. and Wurster, Thomas S., Harvard Business Review (September 1997).] [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:35 am by Tobin Admin
The car driver’s husband and her adult son filed suit against the semi driver, the owner of the trailer that the semi driver was transporting, and the peanut company’s parent company. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by John Elwood
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm by Law Lady
EXPEDIA, INC.; ORBITZ, LLC; INTERNETWORK PUBLISHING CORP., d/b/a Lodging.com; TRAVELOCITY.COM, LLP; PRICELINE.COM, INC.; TRAVELWEB LLC, HOTWIRE, INC.; HOTELS.COM, L. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Vodafone has confirmed that the company is aware of Lapsus$’s claims, CNBC reports. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
Code § 1030(a)(2)(B), the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
The defendant’s earliest registrations were registered from May 2016, though the claim appeared to have kicked off in 2021 (although I could not identify exactly when from the judgment).The judge devoted a good 20-something paragraphs to this issue, eventually concluding that the relevant date was 26 July 2019, because this was the earliest date – on the facts – by which the claimant knew of both: (a) the defendant’s use of its 2015 mark; and (b) the existence of the… [read post]