Search for: "BENCH v. STATE"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 7,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2021, 8:40 am
At the conclusion of the [bench] trial, the district court dismissed Jane Doe's case with prejudice, and found in favor of Mr. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 11:56 pm
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:28 am
” The bench, comprising of Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian, has given WhatsApp four weeks to file its reply, after which the matter will be listed. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 6:02 am
The dispute in Erwin v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
At least since Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 10:31 pm
Alsup's letter to President Biden, electing to "go senior" (i.e., semi-retirement).The case that generated more publicity for him than any other in his 21 years on the bench has been Oracle v. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 3:19 pm
Maryland Rule 8-131(c) From State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am
The judge began with a broad definition: Stated generally the law is clear that patents are directed to those likely to have a real and practical interest in the subject matter of the invention[2]. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:32 am
In Spearman v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 10:23 am
Reisch (decision following bench trial) Another Politician Probably Violated the First Amendment By Blocking a Constituent on Twitter–Campbell v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:27 am
Hearing the case in question, Satish Ragde v State of Maharashtra, on appeal last week, Justice Pushpa Ganediwala, sitting on the Nagpur Bench of the High court, held that there must be “skin to skin contact with sexual intent” for an act to be considered sexual assault under Section 7 of POSCO. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:16 pm
The case was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” Fehr v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
In Garcetti v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Powell v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:41 am
[3] Bank of Montreal v Dynex Petroleum Ltd, 2002 SCC 7 [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:41 am
[3] Bank of Montreal v Dynex Petroleum Ltd, 2002 SCC 7 [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
Before the justices take the virtual bench for the day’s oral arguments, the court is expected to release orders at 9:30 a.m. from the justices’ private conference on Friday. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 2:34 pm
Saraf’s petition argues that the AIBE Rules violate established precedent by the Supreme Court in the cases of V Sudheer v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 10:48 am
The Appellate Division case at issue, Decandia v. [read post]
